Clinical evolution of mediastinitis in patients undergoing adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy after coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunctive treatment in mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective descriptive study, performed between October 2010 and February 2012. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy was indicated in difficult clinical management cases despite antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: We identified 18 patients with mediastinitis during the study period. Thirty three microorganisms were isolated, and polymicrobial infection was present in 11 cases. Enterobacteriaceae were the most prevalent pathogens and six were multi-resistant agents. There was only 1 hospital death, 7 months after the oxygen therapy caused by sepsis, unrelated to hyperbaric oxygen therapy. This treatment was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: The initial data showed favorable clinical outcomes.

Evolução clínica de pacientes com mediastinite pós-cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica submetidos à oxigenoterapia hiperbárica como terapia adjuvante / Clinical evolution of mediastinitis in patients undergoing adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy after coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJETIVO: Avaliação da utilização de oxigenoterapia hiperbárica, como tratamento adjuvante, em casos de mediastinite, em pós-operatório de cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica. MÉTODOS: Estudo descritivo retrospectivo, no período entre outubro de 2010 e fevereiro de 2012. A oxigenoterapia hiperbárica foi indicada nos casos de difícil manejo clínico a despeito da antibioticoterapia. RESULTADOS: Identificaram-se 18 pacientes com mediastinite, nos quais 33 microrganismos foram isolados, estando a infecção polimicrobiana presente em 11 casos. Enterobactérias foram os germes mais prevalentes e seis agentes multirresistentes. Ocorreu 1 óbito, na evolução, 7 meses após o término da oxigenoterapia, por septicemia, não relacionado à terapêutica. O tratamento foi bem tolerado. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados clínicos iniciais foram favoráveis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as an adjunctive treatment in mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective descriptive study, performed between October 2010 and February 2012. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy was indicated in difficult clinical management cases despite antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: We identified 18 patients with mediastinitis during the study period. Thirty three microorganisms were isolated, and polymicrobial infection was present in 11 cases. Enterobacteriaceae were the most prevalent pathogens and six were multi-resistant agents. There was only 1 hospital death, 7 months after the oxygen therapy caused by sepsis, unrelated to hyperbaric oxygen therapy. This treatment was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: The initial data showed favorable clinical outcomes.

Comparação de critérios diagnósticos de insuficiência renal aguda em cirurgia cardíaca / Comparison of diagnostic criteria for acute kidney injury in cardiac surgery

FUNDAMENTO: Há grande controvérsia quanto ao diagnóstico de Insuficiência Renal Aguda (IRA), existindo mais de 30 diferentes definições. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a incidência e os fatores de risco para desenvolvimento de IRA no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca de acordo com os critérios RIFLE, AKIN e KDIGO, e comparar o poder prognóstico desses critérios. MÉTODOS: Estudo de corte transversal que incluiu 321 pacientes (62 [53 - 71] anos, 140 homens) consecutivamente submetidos a cirurgia cardíaca entre junho de 2011 e janeiro de 2012. Os pacientes foram acompanhados por 30 dias, com vistas ao desenvolvimento de um desfecho composto (mortalidade, necessidade de diálise e internação prolongada). RESULTADOS: A incidência de IRA variou de 15% - 51%, conforme o critério diagnóstico adotado. Enquanto a idade se associou ao risco de IRA nos três critérios, houve variação nos demais determinantes. Durante o acompanhamento, 89 pacientes apresentaram o desfecho e todos os critérios se associaram ao risco aumentado na análise Cox univariada e após o ajuste para idade, sexo, diabetes e tipo de cirurgia. Contudo, após novo ajuste para tempo de circulação extracorpórea e presença de baixo débito cardíaco, apenas o diagnóstico de IRA pelo critério KDIGO manteve esta associação significativa (HR= 1,89 [95% IC: 1,18 - 3,06]). CONCLUSÕES: A incidência e os fatores de risco para IRA pós-cirurgia cardíaca têm grande variação de acordo com os critérios diagnósticos utilizados. Em nossa análise, o critério KDIGO se mostrou superior ao AKIN e ao RIFLE quanto ao seu poder prognóstico.

BACKGROUND: There is considerable controversy regarding the diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), and there are over 30 different definitions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for the development of AKI following cardiac surgery according to the RIFLE, AKIN and KDIGO criteria, and compare the prognostic power of these criteria. METHODS: Cross-sectional study that included 321 consecutively patients (median age 62 [53-71] years; 140 men) undergoing cardiac surgery between June 2011 and January 2012. The patients were followed for up to 30 days, for a composite outcome (mortality, need for dialysis and extended hospitalization). RESULTS: The incidence of AKI ranged from 15% - 51%, accordingly to the diagnostic criterion adopted. While age was associated with risk of AKI in the three criteria, there were variations in the remaining risk factors. During follow-up, 89 patients developed the outcome and all criteria were associated with increased risk in the univariate Cox analysis and after adjustment for age, gender, diabetes, and type of surgery. However, after further adjustment for extracorporeal circulation and the presence of low cardiac output, only AKI diagnosed by the KDIGO criterion maintained this significant association (HR= 1.89 [95% CI: 1.18 - 3.06]). CONCLUSION: The incidence and risk factors for AKI after cardiac surgery vary significantly according to the diagnostic criteria used. In our analysis, AKI the KDIGO criterion was superior to AKIN and RIFLE with regard its prognostic power.

Comparison of diagnostic criteria for acute kidney injury in cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: There is considerable controversy regarding the diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), and there are over 30 different definitions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for the development of AKI following cardiac surgery according to the RIFLE, AKIN and KDIGO criteria, and compare the prognostic power of these criteria. METHODS: Cross-sectional study that included 321 consecutively patients (median age 62 [53-71] years; 140 men) undergoing cardiac surgery between June 2011 and January 2012. The patients were followed for up to 30 days, for a composite outcome (mortality, need for dialysis and extended hospitalization). RESULTS: The incidence of AKI ranged from 15% - 51%, accordingly to the diagnostic criterion adopted. While age was associated with risk of AKI in the three criteria, there were variations in the remaining risk factors. During follow-up, 89 patients developed the outcome and all criteria were associated with increased risk in the univariate Cox analysis and after adjustment for age, gender, diabetes, and type of surgery. However, after further adjustment for extracorporeal circulation and the presence of low cardiac output, only AKI diagnosed by the KDIGO criterion maintained this significant association (HR= 1.89 [95% CI: 1.18 - 3.06]). CONCLUSION: The incidence and risk factors for AKI after cardiac surgery vary significantly according to the diagnostic criteria used. In our analysis, AKI the KDIGO criterion was superior to AKIN and RIFLE with regard its prognostic power.